Have I just got terminally miserable ? or am I missing the point somewhere ?
Over the last few days my newspapers have been full of tales about two women
Amy Winehouse and Diana The late Princess of Wales
The huge coverage seems to assume that we care, er why?
In the first example Amy Winehouse, where is the interest in just one more sad and inadequate person with fairly limited talent commiting suicide slowly, painfully and in public, frankly mam I don't give a damn.
Oh and for Christs sake can we stop the endless column inches given over to Diana, she was a damaged, very manipulative and not very bright woman who was briefly married to another person from a similar background with similar baggage. The marriage didn't work, she went off and shagged everything in site and so did he, eventually going back to the woman he should have married in the first place.Sounds like a normal marriage break up to me.
The only good thing that seems to have come from the whole sorry episode are their two sons who are surprisingly level headed and normal.
thats it, she died 10 years ago, yes thats a personal tragedy for her family but enough is enough.
Could someone tell me why the tabloid press have not got hold of something that Harry has touched eaten or smoked so that a DNA test could be run and compared to Hewitt
Munzly
I realise that my suggestion is going to completely negate the purpose of your blog, but why not do what I did 15 years ago, which is chuck out the TV, stop buying newspapers, magazines etc. and only read news items online that you really want to know about. - It's great, for instance I have absolutely no idea who Amy Whitehouse is
Munzly the Hermit