Posts archive for: September, 2007
  • worth the pay ?

    I sometimes wonder what planet the average politician lives on.

    This morning I read that the Brown One is going to give military personnel who have been on tour in Iraq or Afghanistan a discount on their Council Tax.

    Lets look at that statement in detail.

    first there is the obvious fact that this piece of news was kept back from yesterdays Labour Conference speech because the control freaks of Labour needed a high'ish profile press release on their control matrix today just in case the reaction to Gords speech was not suitably ecstatic - so lets pretend we are giving the sqaddies something.
    It is of course giving nothing. Gord has merely told the MoD to give some of their budget to the Local Authorities. so its out of one Government pocket in to another.

    So here is the deal being offered to our military - in exchange for laying down your life in a futile pointless war our grateful Government will let you off £160.00 of tax - fuck off seems the most appropriate reply.

    Do these political twats not realise that if the decision about going to Afghanistan or Iraq was about money then all our people would leave the British Forces and join the legions of " independent security operatives " the private armys and mercenaries that are operating without any responsibility in the war zones. Where £160.00 represents a mornings work. No our people are their because they are loyal and believe in good.

    It has to be the ultimate insult to offer a discount on the Council tax for a property thats unfit for human habitation - have you seen some of the slums that this Government provides for our military? Of course the fact that Gord sold them to George Soros and now has to rent them back and also pay the maintenance is another story for another time.

    Did you notice that the new look given by the spin miesters to Gord ( hey don't forget I'm British ) makes him look just like Danny Devito's portrayal of The Penguin in the Batman movies.

  • Controlling the Benefit System

    Goverments for as long as I am able to remember have struggled with the thorny issue of controlling the amount of money paid in benefits - they have always failed.
    Annually the UK now spends £140,000,000,000 £140 billion a year which equates to £2,600 from every man woman & child. Of course it isn't actually extracted that evenly but thats the subject of another debate.

    Clearly it is well beyond the ability of Government and its army of enforcers to properly police the benefit system or it would by now be under control and clearly it is not.

    So is there a solution ? I think there may well be one that is so simple I am uncertain why it has never been adopted.

    I start from the premise that the desired " norm " is that people stand on their own two feet making their own way in society and that the benefit system is there as a safety net when things go wrong. Hopefully most people would agree that this is correct.

    As its the " Public " that are paying for the benefits via taxation surely it is entirely logical that the process is entirely in the public domain.

    The Government departments that pay out the money have a name and an address for every recipient, if they haven't why not ?

    All we need is a web site organised by postal code that lists the name, address, the amount of money being paid and reason why.

    At a stroke the system becomes self policing, I sure I am no different to most people living in the UK in being able to draw up a list of people locally who do not work, never have done but still seem able to buy a new car, drink every night, smoke, take holidays - you know the list as well as I do.

    While its very easy to bullshit some numpty down the dole office into believing that you are " stressed " or suffering from " anxiety " its rather more difficult to maintain that pretence stood in the bar with your neighbours around you.

    instead of friendsreunited.co.uk we could have reunitedwithworkingandpayingtaxliketherestofus.co.uk

  • multi culturism

    Its odd isn't it how we can discuss most things openly and rationally but the subject of immigration and race is still pretty well taboo.

    Am I alone in thinking that something has slowly crept up on us that now we cannot deal with, if I say in public that I am uncomfortable with the close presence of say a person from another country or a person from another culture I am immediately branded as a racists bigot.
    Well as it happens I am not, but lets look at the origins of my discomfort.

    Although Leakys diggings in Olduvai Gorge suggest the Homo Sapien evolved about 200,000 years ago, its generally considered that modern man evolved about 10,000 to 12,000 years ago.
    Now in evolutionary terms thats sub segments of a nano second, so we are not yet different in any significant way than we were then, apart perhaps from being taller, fatter and no longer all black. ( ie if you accept that Leakys theory that modern man evolved from the Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania, then the early ones must have been black)

    My real point however is that our inbuilt reflexes will not have changed all that much.

    To illustrate my point lets imagine for a moment that we are all sitting around our freshly killed aardvark debating whether the fact that my cave is bigger than yours should automatically mean that I give you more of the aardvark than I get (well thats basically the argument for Council Tax banding)

    When into our cave troops a group of strangers, they demand a share of the aardvark, even though they didn't participate in the hunt and then take up residence in the back of the cave, shun our way of life and insist on being fed.

    It is unlikely at that level that without any understanding of each other, our imaginary cavemen would be saying " hey lets embrace multiculturism " in the same way as lesser animals are programmed. Sentient beings respond to intrusion by either fight or flight, that is how evolution has programmed them to respond. Do you think that the sparrow on your lawn or garden fence when watching a cat is thinking to itself, hey I know we are different but lets live together, no it flys away damn quick before it comes to any harm

    My point being that a wariness of the unknown is a survival instinct built in to us all, not, as the BBC or Guardian would insist, a sign that we are foaming at the mouth right wing racists.

    By making debate all but impossible we are left with the shorthand used by lazy media writers i.e racists don't like a person because they are a different colour, a position as ludicrous as it is possible to be. Stop - now and consider that friend of yours who just happens to be another colour, friendship is colour blind

    There are lots of people I don't like, and I am sure there are lots of people who don't like me - well thats life.

    What the average Brit really feels uncomfortable with is a situation in which " others " ( and in reality no one really gives a damn about their race, creed, gender or sexuality) enter their society and are given preferential treatment. The UK is a nation of remarkably well adjusted people who are also very fair minded, but Governments local or central, that favour the takers over the providers are in fact the racists.

    Touching on the subject of sexuality earlier reminded me of my father, he was born in 1919 and used to tell me that in his youth homosexuality was " the love that dare not speak its name " slowly over the years it became what I think we would now refer to as " the elephant in the room " its there, we know its there, but we are not going to acknowledge or talk about it, then came the legalisation on homosexual practices between consenting adults followed by the good old BBC and well meaning Governments progressively presenting it as merely an alternative life style, My father always maintained that if you followed this trend through to its logical conclusion he wanted to die before it became compulsory. He achieved his wish but as he only died a few years ago it was a close run thing

  • Is it safe to come out again?

    I have been avoiding all media for the last few days, I just could not tolerate the endless, self indulgent column inches devoted to Diana Princess of Wales.
    Good to see that Mike Jackson is still the only senior military man with the balls to tell it as it is, good man Mike, been a long way since Mil Survey. Mike correctly puts the blame for the Iraq mess firmly where it should be, with the Pentagon and Rumsfeld. The former being probably the worse run military machine on the planet, more likely to kill their friends than the enemy and the latter just a moron without a clue that another clueless idiot put in charge of the Iraq strategy. It could have been so easy, decapitate (thats remove their senior officers, not behead them all) the security forces built by Sadam and put some UN Officers in as temporary command pending internal elections but no we have to have willy waving idiots strutting their macho stuff with all the bravery of being out of range. Plus that twat Bliar threw his lot in with the idiots and the rest they say is history, sadly a history built on pools of innocent blood
    Talking of Iraq, here is a foolproof way of knowing when the next UK election is being held - it will be 4 weeks after the Brown One announces the withdrawl of UK troops from Iraq.

Footer:

The content of this website belongs to a private person, blog.co.uk is not responsible for the content of this website.